My understanding from the interview content that was posted...

My understanding from the interview content that was posted yesterday from the Health Minister interview was to direct the TGA to review the existing 28 approved RAT's on the market for professional use to see which products would be most suitable for a self-use approval. I don't believe just because a RAT device is already approved for professional use, that would prequalify it to be given the tick of approval for self-use. I think the suppliers of the device will need to demonstrate the fail safe usability of their RAT for the every day untrained user. Hence why AT1 can not miss the opportunity to do what it can to get on the list of approved medical devices for self-use. Does this answer your question?