It's a good point you make about the assumed accuracy of paid editorial. If they can make such an error in terms of the grade, then maybe they are mis-reporting the 12month target estimation on Wellington as well.
It's a vast tenement at 1,134sq km (think about it) But they have done a fair bit of work already and initial mapping in 2020 has also thrown up some nice targets as well, which is why they applied for it in the first place. They have the agreements in place with the traditional landowners so that box is ticked. So should be ready to go as soon as grants are received this month (hopefully).
Out of interest, this was the announcement where we got the 150 g/t.
4502r9j9p2wtkz.pdf (asx.com.au)As you know Rye, there have been a continuous run of ultra high-grade results from both Mulga Bill and Ironbark. Here is just a sample for those who are not familiar with GBR.
More bonanza grades here:
455gvkk6bkw7y0.pdf (asx.com.au) Thick high-grade 5 September 2022:
45dr07cd3hjryc.pdf (asx.com.au)(apparently this was among the 10 best results globally for the year)
54 g/t in 29 September 2022:
45fm7br85vc27s.pdf (asx.com.au)193g/t at Ironbark 20 October 2022:
45ghrp4vb93lz0.pdf (asx.com.au)121gt 4 November 2022:
45h784161qkbl6.pdf (asx.com.au)
