Hi drifta,
you are con NVA i understood?
Further more, if you raise your doubts I will only understand if it is related to get answers or is it related, hmmm let me say, is it driven to a paid downramping of some companies, or you are looking on HC for upcoming good stages from companies with a lot of positive news and you feel to raise your personal doubts for conversations with holders to make porky yorky (kidding) them?
So your doubts are correct with all exploration companies all over the world!
1 of 100 will be a developer/miner at the end!
Shares on issue? How do you think, could an explorer get money for exploration? Ohhh right, with CR's what means more shares on issue. At the end, what is your doubt?
Did you do a compare with the big Miners and how many shares on issues they have?
They all starting as "small" explorers and need to raise CR's to get money, right?
Hmm, just think about and if you have time (what I expect as you underway in chats whre you are not holding shares) than do the compare, it could help you to understand how the exploration wolrd works.
Tbh not only the amount of shares in the exploration world is extremly high with several billion shares on issue, but i expect, you will know that, right?
But you are right, if you would say, the exploration business is a high risk investment, thats for sure.
Generally and based on NVA facts, here it could be more beneficial to think we have the one of hundreds in the gold exploration sector. (my personal view).
The report figures out the point of income, so two possibilities in my point of view :
Windy folk and snow lake! If its working well, the income is on the cards.
If not, there is still the possibility that NVA raise a new CR at an higher level.
So, you see and if you are free for different minds, it is not dark around nova, the sun shines more as you expect.
Nice Weekend and best wishes
BEO
P. s may you should think about to stop kidding others, just to love kidding them. Many thanks in advance. Merci!!
Expand
(20min delay)