Yeah, that's exactly what I said......until the conditions are...

Yeah, that's exactly what I said......until the conditions are satisfied SKI will not need to buy the final product. BUT they are still bound by a binding contractual document, which (hopefully) includes an obligation that both parties use reasonable endeavors to satisfy the conditions precedent.....meaning that if they don't use such reasonable endeavors AUZ can sue them for breach of contract......because the contract is BINDING.

I know the elements to make a contract chief. 

Ps anyone who post the Twiggy Forest HC decision labels a contract as "binding" when it isn't would be a complete mug. As little as you seem to think of the BOD, I am pretty comfortable they wouldn't have made that mistake.....

I just need to live mate.....I have learned more than enough on this topic.

You go back to sitting in your dark room relying on "google law".