Melbourne protests against Milo turn violent, page-174

MB is or was sex between a male and a male ever a phobia? Is it it a phobia today? I don't think so.

Under what systems of values? Secular? Instinct?

"Be scared of male to male sex," said God? I think not.

I'd disagree.


I think the sentiment has traditionally been, and always has been, that of contempt. Contempt better describes the heterosexual Christian sentiment towards gays. Gays are not, and were never feared. They are perhaps dehumanised. Even that is wrong, because the large Christian Churches have all accepted all humans, as it is Christs doctrine that none are perfect. It is expected that all humans are failures. We all have our cross to bear. That was why God despathed us to earth.


[As I understand the generic Christian position...]

Islam takes another tack. I believe Milo covers that ground well... but here too, I don't truly think ISIS caliphaters have sleepless nights, wondering if they've locked all the gays out at night, either?

Not a phobia, is it?

Or do the intersectionals have new words for their reinvented suit of liturgical and lexical medical & socio-psycho pathologist.


Who ever decided there was/is a general sense of homophobia, got it wrong.

Believing so, is incorrect.

Why do we so easily adopt & use such wrong terms?