@WoS, not sure exactly what you're referring to in my post, i...

@WoS, not sure exactly what you're referring to in my post, i don't see any conflict with your clarification.

I'm talking broadly about the entire field of cancer immunology, using Cvac's estimated cost as an example of comparative pricing to current standard of care. I'm aware how Cvac is intended to be used in the trial, but the future of immunology (and fingers crossed, Cvac) surely is to replace chemo... and eventually surgery.
we could be using them in the manner of the classical definition of 'vaccine'. preventative treatments, pre-cancer.
wouldn't that be nice?

putain de cancer de merde. pardon my french.