Meo History question

Hi Guys
Just a question that has baffled me since my first post here!
l am a holder of Mosman shares and done very well with them.
l trust our BOD as they have brought a company to the market and achieved
a lot to build up permits and get a foot print in the sand.
l don't feel based on Mosman 8 months trading that Spitfire has the right to base the
statements he makes on its financial position or future oil quantities regardless of quantity .
Meo has not been targeted as a cash cow as it only has limited funds and a lot of work to
get further down the line as Mosman have .
The offer and the reaction are based on business models that will work for growth to all involved .
Whichever way this goes remember every poster have there reasons to post there views , mine is l can
see the next year of growth for the combined companies and the gains for both company share holders.
Now for the question .
Why did Meo and its Directors all fall out leaving Strickland to try to salvage a company that
is able to grow for so long filtering the funds which, could have been used for growth in the exploration
of the worthwhile assets you have.