MEP or ADN, page-611

I tend to believe MeP holders know all about the HK implications and how profitable it will become in the future. It's more that ADN (James Marsh in particular) is out at all the mining conferences talking about it. All MEP gets is a small mention.

Now if MEP was out and about even doing 25% (relevant to their stake) and reflect the implications of that 25% with such a smaller amount of SOI, it would prove to inclvestors the value of buying into a minority partner in the project. At the moment all they are seeing is 75% adn= 75% profits to share holders, and not the actual numbers.

Perhaps a Crux interview would be beneficial as he loves to go over figures. Some coverage from the BOD would definitely highlight the significant gap.