message from adam bandt, page-31

50% - no that is an alarmist claim which i don't support at all.

Realism and accurate science/math is important here, as well as accounting for unknowns and quantifying surprises etc.

I recently analysed the C13 in scat, earth, water, sand etc...foods...I won't say where for i am not allowed to.
But you would be surprised at what the gov/media withholds from your knowledge.

There are opportunities to speak with and learn from qualified people about destruction of Gt Barrier Reef and politicians are not the source. Nor are money hungry investors.