Share
clock Created with Sketch.
08/09/14
13:18
Share
Originally posted by kingpins
↑
Hi niels
Taking your point that the two sides may never meet you then approach the next point as to what to do about it.
The options put forward by the deniers ( sorry the warmists) are so draconian that they will never win over the other side.
The cost of the rectification is ridiculous, if you take GW and I think everyone agrees that Australia's percentage of this is 0.04% even if we could cut it to zero what good will it do when the skies over China and India and purple with smog.
WE send ourselves broke for what?
If the warmists can come up with worthwhile solutions then they may get some consensus from the people who are not convinced but the ratbag remedies that have been put forward will only drive the wedge further in
So how are we going to act now?
We have had in place legislation to control emissions for the last umpteen years, why were they not being enforced?
We hear all the time of this wide body of scientists who can prove something is going to happen, they put some doubtful data into a computer and come up with a computer model scenario, not fact just a computer generated opinion
I even read that the stations where they test for GW are in a compromised location so the data can not be relied on to be accurate.
The lies and fabrications that have occurred in the scientific community and the peer reviewed data are numerous and then you have the fact that the vast majority of these scientists are anything but independent and so their results are also compromised, finally I have to be very cynical when I hear that 500 of the world top scientists are stating a fact with one voice
Can anyone tell me how many people in the world are qualified to call them selves a scientist?
Just got the answer from Google --- 5.8 million So big deal 500 are in agreement on something
Expand
So you want to be a leaner not a lifter and not only are you from one of the strongest economies in the world, but we are one of the largest per capita fossil carbon polluters as well ?
The consensus among climate scientists is over 97%. You forgot the qualifier; climate scientists, not scientists in general.