I can probably answer point 6 quite definitively. If pH 0, the project is worthless based on how the market is valuing peers. A REE clay developer based in WA released an updated JORC today, indicated resource 120 Mt @ 1632 ppm TREO. They use pH 0 and get "good" recoveries of 60% average. Strip ratio is decent at <1 so that isn't a factor in valuation. Market them valued at $0.7 m project EV.
Based on this, and VMS average drill grades being comparable at ~1550 ppm TREO, if their mets rely on pH 0 then the market would value the project close to nil. There's a few other peer examples using pH 0 to draw on to support this argument, but I won't list any as I am not advertising a bunch of dog stocks here.
Now, AR mentioned "ionic" many many times with Samso. That has a widely accepted definition of pH 3 to pH 4 leaching with a salt (like ammonium sulphate). AR would not be throwing around "ionic" with such abandon if he didn't have some met work in his back pocket at pH 3-4 right?
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- Met results
I can probably answer point 6 quite definitively. If pH 0, the...
-
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 76 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add VMS (ASX) to my watchlist
(20min delay)
|
|||||
Last
1.8¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $43.90M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
1.9¢ | 1.9¢ | 1.8¢ | $26.20K | 1.417M |
Buyers (Bids)
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
8 | 1630816 | 1.8¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
1.9¢ | 1593959 | 9 |
View Market Depth
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
8 | 1630816 | 0.018 |
20 | 4317596 | 0.017 |
16 | 3059695 | 0.016 |
7 | 2507162 | 0.015 |
4 | 1510000 | 0.014 |
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
0.019 | 1593959 | 9 |
0.020 | 1664426 | 10 |
0.021 | 1166000 | 2 |
0.022 | 2640154 | 7 |
0.023 | 880000 | 4 |
Last trade - 16.10pm 14/08/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
Featured News
VMS (ASX) Chart |