I'm a bit surprised at the massive drop in sp from this saga. Could be something I'm missing. Sure there should have been disclosure about BIG's dealings with Finstro and going forward maybe much more clarification on the relationship. What should really matter is that BIG's customer uptakes are real. The facility simply provides customers with the option of spreading their payment over a certain period.
In light of the new information the question of profitability really comes to mind. As much of the cash are received up front it looks great on the quarterly but how profitable is it? How much dilution via issue of shares or fees and guarantees does BIG have to provide to Finstro for those privileges ?
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- BIG
- MF Article - BIG Shareholders go guarantor for revenue growth. Is it sustainable?
MF Article - BIG Shareholders go guarantor for revenue growth. Is it sustainable?, page-142
-
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 98 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add BIG (ASX) to my watchlist
(20min delay)
|
|||||
Last
$2.22 |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $388.8M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | $0 | 0 |
Featured News
The Watchlist
NUZ
NEURIZON THERAPEUTICS LIMITED
Michael Thurn, CEO & MD
Michael Thurn
CEO & MD
SPONSORED BY The Market Online