which is better way to value something?
on the basis of 10 years of past performance or one or two misfires?
Basically, 8 wins out of 11 years or 3 years of bad performance
8/11 = 73% vs 3/11 = 27%
think cricket and Steve smith getting a 50.
Steve smith gets 50 ... 73% of the time and he misses out 27% of the time.
would you put him in your team or leave him out?
which is better way to value something?on the basis of 10 years...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 92 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add MFG (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
$8.48 |
Change
0.060(0.71%) |
Mkt cap ! $1.532B | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| $8.42 | $8.50 | $8.41 | $2.213M | 261.9K |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | 2525 | $8.47 |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| $8.48 | 2185 | 1 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 01/07/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| MFG (ASX) Chart |