***same post in better format? **When i read the article earlier...

***same post in better format? **

When i read the article earlier this morning i don't rember seeing the last bit - "EWC's claims have been greatly exaggerated and, although the company has been unable to deliver on its promises and properly inform the market, it is fair to point out that its claims to build an LNG facility in Indonesia are fair dinkum" etc where he admits Sengkang LNG is apparently going ahead and the "missing" LNG plant exists .

Was it always there ?

It seems to make the previous parts of the story pointless as any serious shareholder knows if Sengkang works we are made and everything else is a bonus .

In any case he is conceding his last EWC story was wrong and the guts of this story seems to be that EWC over egg future projects , well i'm sure its not the only company that does that.

I'm bemused if a skeptic like this guy concedes Sengkang is a legitimate project then writes it up in a story that make sures the sp get smashed anyway .