Given the reduced potential of the Lockyer field as a result of L2 result (potential resource area of 11sqkm above FWL), it is likely MIN will be processing gas from their LD and NED fields, and perhaps Hancock's 50% WE gas as well. Whilst it may make perfect sense to have one consolidated gas proecessing plant, with the ideal central location being around mid-west of EP469 (previously shown by STX), as well as one entity holding all the gas reserve to produce from, I just don't see CE being the type to offer a price that will be acceptable to our BOD, many of whom holds significant stake in the company.
Mind you, I had been constantly wrong about almost every twists and turns in the WGO takeover that I don't even believe in my own thinking on the matter anymore In my mind, I still see a lot of reasons for WES to be a very interested party and yet, they would rather spend more time publicly complaining about the gas policy in WA than buy a company with sufficient gas to power Mt Holland and WesCEF for many years to come.
618
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- STX
- Min Res LNG story
Min Res LNG story, page-22
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 19 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add STX (ASX) to my watchlist
(20min delay)
|
|||||
Last
21.5¢ |
Change
-0.010(4.44%) |
Mkt cap ! $623.2M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
22.0¢ | 22.5¢ | 21.5¢ | $489.4K | 2.223M |
Buyers (Bids)
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
48 | 948651 | 21.5¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
22.0¢ | 791225 | 25 |
View Market Depth
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
49 | 959040 | 0.215 |
25 | 1315969 | 0.210 |
34 | 1344789 | 0.205 |
33 | 1923971 | 0.200 |
23 | 892347 | 0.195 |
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
0.220 | 782085 | 25 |
0.225 | 1489592 | 29 |
0.230 | 4167956 | 31 |
0.235 | 620830 | 19 |
0.240 | 1464831 | 19 |
Last trade - 12.14pm 03/10/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
Featured News
STX (ASX) Chart |