Mine and Infrastructure Costs, page-164

No. The 'emphasis' should have been per thread title and the post that kicked this thread off - 'just a realistic approach to supplying our off-take partner with a commodity'.

Now you seem very willing to keep discussing spherical Prime - but the one thing you still ignore is that TON now have links to GK -the inventors of spherical.

And I find your comment that this 'is not a forum for technical discussion' offensive personally. Especially when you tout your resume of decades in whatever field of study you spent your working career in but always deflect and avoid when the discussion turns technical under the guise that your are performing a HC civil service by shielding us non technical plebs from using our brain power. What are you saying - people who post on HC are too dense to understand?

You need to have this out with utrade. Largely because you're the one that came into his discussion with that other poster above that mentioned rolling up flakes to make spherical. You came in to correct them and now you're backing out coz the discussion is too technical for HC?

More importantly if I've understood utrade correctly his stated method for spherodizing may actually completely avoid the reservations I had for using milling and grinding to make spherical with large flake due to the rhom phase it induces in the stacking sequences of G.

Which is what HC is all about. Learning.

And learning sometimes requires us to sometimes admit we got it wrong.

You two could keep the 'lesson' going if YOU choose to Prime. I'm certainly interested in hearing more. So you got anything else other than those L plate links for the graphite investor that only just invested yesterday in their first graphite stock - something we more 'seasoned' players can read.

The 1. and 2. in utrade's post. Looking a lot like 1. and not 2. from where I'm sitting. Prove me wrong. Have the 'technical' discussion with utrade.