Finally some detail that clarifies a good deal of vagueness. How much more ridicule will be dished out for my now very strong hypothesis suggesting that geologically KM is not analogous to Oyu Tolgoi (island arc), but is instead Andean (continental margin, subduction), and that the exploration program is pointing to that model?
I doubt we will see another Oyu Tolgoi comparison for KM from the company again (as in page 11 of yesterday's presentation). Although that model remains valid for Khongur.
But holders can say they read the El Teniente, Chile comparison first not in today's quarterly, but here on Hot Copper - as it has been some months now that I have been building a case for that hypothesis which now appears confirmed.
A good quarterly VOR, some of us like to know what we are looking at beyond the hype and hyperbole. A bit more detailed core description would be nice though.
