"Pattyp, in your valuation is there a reason why you used only 10yrs for the DCF calc?"
Because it is deemed too difficult to estimate further than 10 years into the future. This is a text book type limitation, but there is no reason why you cant do the entire 30 years.
"Pattyp, in your valuation is there a reason why you used only...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 177 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add RWD (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
5.9¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $13.44M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | $0 | 0 |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5548 | 5.9¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 7.0¢ | 34351 | 1 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.17pm 25/07/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| RWD (ASX) Chart |
Day chart unavailable