mining and the markets, page-40

re: going round in circles bros so back to facts Actually I thought nestor's post was excellent, it is good to get reality checks
-The sulphides may NOT be a goer, I dont believe this to be the likely case but the issue still stands. Geology is extremely important to the viability of the project and we know nothing of it.
-What if our U resource does not turn up? hmmm? dont burn me at the cross merely cause it was suggested. If thats the case how many would sell? I value CMR nearly entirely off its oxides and sulphides.

We dont even need to "U-tag" our prospects are so good....fully funded....holy craap!

Blue blue sky is nice but its the "bread and butter" sulphides that will make us the real money imo

cheers,
michael.