Australia's largest stock trading and investment forum Australia's #1 stock forum

and whoever thumbed that up is another no idea. that "girl"...

First 7 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
Sector

35,472 Posts.

2863

18/06/15

18:25

Post #: 15492094
Share

Originally posted by jantimot ↑

Really? I thought this one was interesting

"I’ve found what works best is to start with an investment property rather than an owner occupied and then ensure this investment property provides positive cash flow. The property will still be negatively geared as you hold a mortgage over it, however, the income you receive is greater than your expenses making it positive cash flow. This also means that the additional funds you make from the property increases your overall income, meaning your ability to service the loan increases. This means you could then buy an owner-occupied property and have the positive income from your investment helping to pay down the property you live in."

Negatively geared with positive cash flow .... perhaps she is a guru after all!

Expand

and whoever thumbed that up is another no idea.

that "girl" would eat you bears for breakfast and spit you out for brunch.

No wonder that there are so many misinformed, ignorant and dumb posts on here.

Last edited by Sector: 18/06/15
1 Upvote

Reply

Top Stories

Building value through discovery in Mexico’s silver heartland

Listen: HotCopper Wire Podcast 016 – FY25 ended up not so bad... but Trump unpause is coming

AII

Inside the depths of Panasqueira: A legacy carved in rock

A junior miner unlocking high-grade potential in British Columbia

TMK

TMK Energy brings Canadian drill partner back for one last Gurvantes XXXV pilot well

First 7 Last