Not at all, current share holders have had and still have fair warning they will be diluted long before it will happen. On the other hand aggrieved shareholders have had no warning they will be diluted by others after the settlement amount was agreed on. Can you understand the difference here???
I'm starting to think SH should not accept less then the fair compensation which I believe to be well in excess of $100M. If SGH can't pay up let them go bust and SH are still going to get the maximum insurance.
