Australia's largest stock trading and investment forum Australia's #1 stock forum

Missing aircraft......why??, page-3

First 3 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
LJsilver

4,702 Posts.

15

11/06/16

01:55

Post #: 18011905
Share

Originally posted by goon ↑

Recently I wrote to Boeing asking why all aircraft built don't have the inside of the outer skin tattooed in a grid of individual numbers and letters . My belief is that it would assist in 1. Identifying the aircraft itself in the case of pieces washing ashore after a crash or misadventure. 2. Would assist in reconstructing a wreckage if the numbers and letters corresponded to certain areas of the fuselage.
I got no acknowledgement or reply.....neither did I expect any , but it seems ridiculous that they find a piece of wreckage and have to speculate what part of which plane it might be. The solution doesn't seem so difficult to me. Maybe it's a simplistic view but I thought I would put it out there for discussion. Any thoughts Copperites?

Expand

I don't get why they don't have more than one 'black box'.

Why not have 2 or 3 or hell even 10?
3 Upvote

Reply

Top Stories

ASX Market Close: Tariff fatigue truly evident; RBA eftpos proposal sinks Tyro

WIN

'Incorrect datasets': Old irony sets WIN Metals up for golden opportunity at Emjay

Listen: HotCopper Wire Podcast 017 – RBA holds the toppings

Tuesday's HotCopper trends: Sayona intercepts, Bowen Coking crisis | July 15

AII

Inside the depths of Panasqueira: A legacy carved in rock

First 3 Last

SPONSORED BY