I agree. Ordinarily a CEO who'd woefully missed production targets and drastically downgraded the capabilities of a company's flagship product and had nothing to show for 2 years and millions spent, would be sacked. But Peter Coker has been given what amounts to a promotion! Is it because of a job well done? Is it possible that all the above, that we view as failures are actually what he was appointed to achieve? and it's all part of a master plan that we're yet unaware of?
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- MJP
- MJP - (Former) CEO Theory
MJP - (Former) CEO Theory, page-2
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 16 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)