I am certain of it.
The disclosure of the caucus policy in Parliament, documented for eternity on Hansard, makes it a certainty.
I know this proves bias but I think it does way more than just show bias.
It is the missing link that explains "why".
Why would King recuse herself - explained
Why would Husic categorically ignore the NOPTA advice - explained
Why would Husic have concerns about financial capacity when $10M cash is held - explained.
None of the above makes sense without the caucus policy.
Then, Advent can contrast how PEP11 has been treated in comparison to EMP, and while King/Husic/Albo and others conspired to refuse PEP11, Minister King makes more acreage leases at the exact same time. See https://www.upstreamonline.com/exploration/short-sighted-and-ill-informed-industry-association-slams-no-seismic-rule-on-australias-new-exploration-acreage/2-1-1681858
As Matt Canavan remarked in 2018...
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
0.5¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $9.248M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | $0 | 0 |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 13 | 9133360 | 0.4¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 0.5¢ | 19251425 | 11 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.21pm 30/07/2025 (20 minute delay) ? |
| MMR (ASX) Chart |
Day chart unavailable