Are any other shareholders of MNS finding great difficulty in getting any value out of the MNS threads on HC ?
Two posters who have nearly 9000 posts between them post incessant negative, irrelevant and derogatory posts about MNS using terms like 'dog management' , 'dog stock', 'ratpoo' and feel the need to reply to any post on the stock with these repetitive and incessant words repeated thousands of times. Much of language they use is a breach of HC's TOU, yet the thousands of such posts continue 24/7.
Most of us have these 2 posters on 'Ignore' but unfortunately some posters continue to engage with these two, so very few posts now allow an investor to get other posters views on the pros and cons of this stock and the discussion just decends into name calling.
Have a look at other shares on HC and the discussion is largely cordial with lots of positives and negatives of a stock being discussed in a mostly cordial manner.
I really hope either MNS or HC takes action against these 2 posters so HC becomes a valuable resource for researching MNS for both shareholders and potential shareholders of MNS.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- MNS threads on HC
Are any other shareholders of MNS finding great difficulty in...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 1,995 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add MNS (ASX) to my watchlist
(20min delay)
|
|||||
Last
4.2¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $50.37M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | $0 | 0 |
Featured News
MNS (ASX) Chart |
Day chart unavailable
The Watchlist
SER
STRATEGIC ENERGY RESOURCES LIMITED
David DeTata, Managing Director
David DeTata
Managing Director
SPONSORED BY The Market Online