Correct TON samples are proven to be 10% and proven to be similar at depth up to 475m. however the distribution of jumbo flake are minimum with contamination.
Thus in order obtain same amount of jumbo flake with MNS at shallow area you have to mine up to this depth.
If you look at my earlier estimation. MNS does not have to go into this depth to be able to server the MOU.
And Most important MOU get tick off or not.
" the front end of your plant is going to have to be twice as big to yeild the same result."
So it is the other way around dont you think?
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- MNS
- MNS Vs TON
MNS Vs TON, page-122
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 26 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add MNS (ASX) to my watchlist
|
|||||
Last
4.2¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $50.37M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | $0 | 0 |
Featured News
MNS (ASX) Chart |
Day chart unavailable