MNS Vs TON, page-79

Thank Matt72.

As i have state i model that up base on the minimum number from previous ann as for certain of MOU tick off.

Please note Jumbo category is for 300 microns and above.
As per my post yesterday I believe TON would have approx 10-15% in this category.
MNS has 56% in this category which is unmatched worldwide.

If i wasnt correct... 56% only based on block F. with C and D i believe it is close to 45%.
So i decide to work on 45%.

With the depth 46 -> 64m... I believe the deepest we have gone was 125m however mostly between range 46 -> 64 for our samples. so work on this shallow measure. TON is at depth 400m. So i try to be optimistic on MNS with 400m depth.

Not to argue with you Matt, you correct TON cannot compared with MNS in term of quality.
What i am trying to do here, to let others see MOU tick off will no longer be issue.