"So the ICJ/ICC is ruling to stop Israel responding to the...

  1. 139 Posts.
    lightbulb Created with Sketch. 2
    "So the ICJ/ICC is ruling to stop Israel responding to the attack on its citizens.
    Apparently under the new model for wars , "civilians" can't be harmed and encircled populations have to have food and supplies provided by the attackers.
    So were WW2 to be replayed the allies would have had to feed Berlin and Tokyo and not bomb them. "
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    Wrong.
    This is not a war between armies of two countries - Israel isn't fighting against army of another country.
    Israel is an occupying nation - it occupies the Gaza Strip, the West Bank and East Jerusalem (the West Bank is almost annexed by now, actually)
    Israel, as an occupier has responsibilities (as stipulated in relevant laws) that it must fulfil.
    One of those responsibilites is to ensure the occupied by them people have means to survive.

    Comparing WW2, where we had armies involved is a totally different scenario - can't be compared to Israel vs Hamas in Gaza.

    You can easily find relevant info online that confirm that, I don't have any links at hand to provide you with.
    Last edited by borabora69: 25/05/24
 
arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.