monckton wipes the floor with dennis, page-123

Mike,

You went to the trouble to answer my post twice so the least I can do is respond.
I am sure my own clumsy fingers make more than enough mistakes but I did choose that word "dribble" deliberately. I do like to sprinkle a little metaphor into the mixture and what could be a better time than when discussion turns to elements and compounds?

Here is a reference on some of the many different types of errors we mortals insert into our prose.

http://englishforacademicpurposes.blogspot.com/2009/04/lexical-error-in-novice-academic.html

I am sure to be guilty as charged with respect to many of these tiny lettered crimes; I am guilty too of misplacing semicolons and being rude to denialists. I don't apologise for inventing the word "denialist", and I do vigorously confront their lies. The words become very direct, to the point and yes, rude at times.

The denialist banner is woven into a fabric of deception. Lord Monckton is a master when he waves the denialist flag of dishonesty. He may be convincing but so too are many charlatans. However eruditely he flowers his prose, his lies remain lies.

Debunking Monckton's current crop of disinformation is hardly worth the effort. Take a peek at what Google has to say on the subject.

http://www.google.com.au/search?source=ig&hl=en&rlz=&q=Monckton+debunked&aq=f&aqi=g1g-m2&aql=&oq=

Cheers. ( I mixed a metaphor specially for you Mike; enjoy.)