Monday Shareholder Update, page-8

There would be no reason I could think of as to what management could gain by being vague. The uncertainty is frustrating beyond belief. We have no company statement that says categorically that we have all land holders on side. There are theorists here who say we just need a majority. The point is, the company would know, so an answer to that question should be set in concrete NOW. If there are no dissenting land owners (the company should know this by now), then presumably it is in the bag and we just wait for the SI Government to process things properly. It seems pretty straight forward to me, so some clear definitive statements about this should allay many shareholder concerns. Enough time has transpired since the Coa decision. Maybe these have been answered today, I was not at the meeting.