There is a difference between the surrogate endpoints not reaching the levels set down by Teva after 120ish patients, and the dmc thinking the trial will definitely fail.
If there was NO such difference, why would Teva have put the clause around surrogate endpoints in at all?
Money Week 22/9/16, page-11
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 14 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add MSB (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
$1.19 |
Change
0.085(7.69%) |
Mkt cap ! $1.358B | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| $1.10 | $1.20 | $1.09 | $13.21M | 11.37M |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 15000 | $1.19 |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| $1.19 | 75212 | 5 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 12/07/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| MSB (ASX) Chart |