I'm seeking legal advice on this one team. Sorry the level of arrogance and poor conduct by the board and management team would not pass a fiduciary test IMO.
Shareholders took a huge risk in seeding this company.
I have barely received any correspondence prior to the constitution changes.
The comparison table used by the company is also wrong on so many levels. Company valuations are not done on how much the buy-back price is compared to their buy-in price. They are done on company financials which allow shareholders to properly value their holdings. I.e. you dont just say yes to the liquidity event because it is 7x more than your buy in price. The valuation might actually mean its worth 100x your buy in price. Duhhhh!!!
