Look I'm sorry if I have raised unpopular point but I just posted that now censored link because it was from a smart guy. I just did the numbers on NMDD0092 myself and if you generously assume all of the missing intervals are 0.45g/t - ie just below the stated 0.5g/t cut off and do a length weighted intersection from the top to the bottom of the intersection ie 162m to 596m you get 434m @1.34g/t NOT 3.1g/t.
I do these table all the time and the way it is stated is misleading and in basically just plain WRONG
Sorry if that seem unpopular - I will not labour the point
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- CDV
- More brilliant results
More brilliant results, page-32
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 24 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add CDV (ASX) to my watchlist
Currently unlisted public company.
The Watchlist
I88
INFINI RESOURCES LIMITED
Charles Armstrong, CEO & Managing Director
Charles Armstrong
CEO & Managing Director
SPONSORED BY The Market Online