I doubt it dorak . But precedence was set with the last speaker of the house that if you take liberty of your entitlements expect scrutiny.
Thats was for figure of around a thousand dollars and was referred to the Fedarla police for investigation .
Now we see a liberty for around five thousand dollars which does not meet the entitlement rulings?
You need the law to be consistent of this i think would be fair in the expectations of the public?
Thee last speaker was convicted then won on an appeal.
You can explore expenses from this website to form your own opinion into the entitlements.
http://www.finance.gov.au/publications/parliamentarians-reporting/parliamentarians-expenditure-P35/
- Forums
- Political Debate
- More Burke largesse
More Burke largesse, page-20
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 9 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Featured News
The Watchlist
SER
STRATEGIC ENERGY RESOURCES LIMITED
David DeTata, Managing Director
David DeTata
Managing Director
SPONSORED BY The Market Online