Jakita, I appreciate your input and don't want to belabour your point however I don't think your description of "theoretical cure" applies to my statement. THEORETICAL... CONCERNED WITH OR INVOLVING THE THEORY OF A SUBJECT OR AREA OF STUDY RATHER THAN ITS PRACTICAL APPLICATION.
In the statement I made the patient had his testicular cancer CURED (as well as other cancers diminished) by the PRACTICAL APPLICATION of the product.
There's nothing theoretical about that.
As for PAT-SM6 if you check you will discover that the product partially failed (bear with me here) I think, one out of eleven criteria and there was considerable doubt raised about the rejection.
Then there was the insurance payout, the details of which would be interesting reading to all PAB supporters. Keep the faith.
