I have my doubts about this innuendo concerning Andrews.
But ... the issue of the date (something rather crucial) of the fall seems weird. If it happened on the morning of the Monday, why did news of it not appear until Wednesday? The Age first reported it Wednesday March 10th and says he had a 'nasty fall' ... "yesterday morning" .... Tuesday ???
Whatever the truth is (and I honestly do not believe the story of him being assaulted ... ) ... I do think the Victorian media knows much more than its telling us. And its a real worry when you cannot trust the media to do its job.
