So your independent thinking has you more interested in something that has no substance to it vs. something that is proved to have substance?
Chalk & cheese is correct? There is no comparison.....one is made up the other is fact! Can you see my dilemma? Both leaders have zipped lips but you choose to comment on the made up story & dismiss the other where the facts still prevail that a radical had the ear of the PM....
Now if a story is made up the media will soon discover & move on which they have......but you don't trust that you keep calling for Dan to comment with a small group of others whereas everyone else is over it & don't give a rats!
You do however misconstrue & belittle facts about the other case by saying it's a sibling issue & analogy of left vs. right neglecting to mention the whole family including the Mother had warned the authorities of this person being dangerous. If Scotty is still talking to a radical (who is part of a listed FBI radical group) why is that of no relevance to you yet to comment on a made up story is?
Can you see through the chalk & cheese & rather the conundrum you present when you claim to be an independent thinker?
