more positive broker research , page-6

auto
I am just looking for consistency. On the other stock the main argument put forward is that it has no future because in the past it has done very poorly. Back in June 2006 Roc peaked at $4.32 and now 38 cents.


However I agree that the past is not relevent and as I posted last week I have purchased Roc at 34 cents. I now hold both stock and the biggest gains will be made from Roc if it can rid this tag of a perrenial under performer

I see a lot of similarities between Roc and the other stock. The other stock is probably 6 to 12 months behind in proving the market wrong.

While you may see that the other stock could go broke I dont see that a a real risk. Before christmas I think the risk was real but sentoment has changed enough in my mind that more capital could now be raised if required.

I now own Roc for the second time having originally purchased stock in it's original IPO at $2 many years ago.