and Blewitt states he was in Perth when the Power of Attorney was signed, and dated...by him **** Wilson and gillard were not present, nor in Perth... so there is no way that she could have witnessed his signature...this equates to a massive fraud
also the house was purchased on the 13.2.1993 and the power of attorney was invalid, not completed, nor witnessed...at that date... it appears to me, to be a total fabrication and fraud, by both wilson and gillard...
have a look at this...
JohnL There are a number of issues The date is allegedly false the POA was not made by Blewitt on the 4th of Feb 1993. In fact he says he made it on the week following the bid >10 days later. Wilson then allegedly did not have the PoA necessary to purchase the house in Blewitt's name when the bid was made on the 13th of Feb but must have represented to the Agent that he did, likely that Ms Gillard would have had to confirm this. (Realestate agentshould have notes to this effect, Blewitt as the "purchaser" should be able to ask for access if these still exist) Witnessed by: Julia Gillard This is allegedly false as according to Blewitt she did not witness the signature of Blewitt signing the PoA only Wilson was present. This is the worst possible case with the Donor signing in front of receiver in the absence of witnesses. Witnesses are needed to ensure that the Donor was of sound mind (not drunk, incapacitated etc) and not subject to threats/blackmail etc when signing (not saying he was). I assume money laundering was against the law in 1993, can S&G be implicated in this through the actions of one of their partners? They have allegedly washed the cheque from monies gained from illegal activities through their accounts into the purchase of real property for the personal gain of an individual. Michael when you contact S&G, a couple to pointedly worded questions to them on this are needed. No client/Lawyer privilege exists in matters of a criminal nature such as the commission of a fraud. S&G should hand documents to the relevant authorities immediately. If the partners at the time and now have concealed evidence of a criminal act (fraud or money laundering) they are in serious serious trouble. Nick Styant-Browne or Gordon may want to make a statement to you or to the relevant authorites before they ask them to make one to them. Murphy and Gillard will remain silent, until they are forced to testify in front of a Royal commission. http://www.michaelsmithnews.com/
ps mods, michael smith provides copies of the original documents, and has statements signed by Blewitt to confirm these facts...
