Lambda. For this intended rally of yours why does there have to be a short covering rally ?
I showed over in the charting forum that of the 10 stocks with the highest percentage of shorts they don't need for any of them to be covered to rally up in some cases over 100%
Check out jbh flt hvn djs mts etc, all have larger percentage shorts than LYC but have all rallied strong ...some 100% plus... Why ?
So what makes LYC any different?
It's obvious that the ones that are clinging to this SHorts have to be covered for LYC to move are blinded by the fact that it's the companies FA that's holding it back and that's hog tied by the REE price
Is nothing to do with the shorts it's the FA FA FA
Lambda. For this intended rally of yours why does there have to...
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
$8.28 |
Change
0.030(0.36%) |
Mkt cap ! $7.745B | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| $8.20 | $8.37 | $8.16 | $25.82M | 3.120M |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2000 | $8.26 |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| $8.28 | 2115 | 4 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 09/07/2025 (20 minute delay) ? |
| LYC (ASX) Chart |