it's probably not fair to say the shareholder company may be fine even if their listed office is a rented share space in New York- it's more the claims made on the BEZ thread - seems to be a bit of "confusion" around the shareholder's name
it's probably not fair to say the shareholder company may be fine even if their listed office is a rented share space in New York
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
