hillary merely recited a practiced and rehearsed script and hurled a series of provocative personal insults at Trump probably hoping to goad him into a over-reaction so she could pretend to be attacked by Trump...
Most of hillary's political spiel was just endless meaningless duckspeak that contained next to no content and just means that hillary has no plans except to continue with the disasterous and destructive leftist policies of looting and warmongering as the failed obama...
Trump was spontaneous and held his cool despite hillary's hurled stream of irrelevent personal insults and just concentrated on communicating with his massive and growing voter base across the various communities of the US...
It seems like Trump by holding his temper forced hillary to escalate her personal insults which made her look petty, vindictive and low-level while Trump looked presidential and above her attempts to goad him into a leftist style food-fight of trading childish time-wasting insults...
It looks like Trump played the old "rope-a-dope" strategy on hillary to perfection...
For those who need to be reminded of what duckspeak is: Duckspeak[edit]
Duckspeak is a Newspeak term meaning literally to quack like a duck or to speak without thinking. Duckspeak can be either good or "ungood" (bad), depending on who is speaking, and whether what they are saying is in following with the ideals of Big Brother. To speak rubbish and lies may be ungood, but to speak rubbish and lies for the good of "The Party" may be good. In the appendix to 1984, Orwell explains:
Ultimately it was hoped to make articulate speech issue from the larynx without involving the higher brain centres at all. This aim was frankly admitted in the Newspeak word duckspeak […]. Like various words in the B vocabulary, duckspeak was ambivalent in meaning. Provided that the opinions which were quacked out were orthodox ones, it implied nothing but praise, and when the Times referred to one of the orators of the Party as a doubleplusgood duckspeaker it was paying a warm and valued compliment.
— Orwell, Nineteen Eighty-Four
An example of a skillful duckspeaker in action is provided in the beginning of chapter 9, in which an Inner Party speaker is haranguing the crowd about the crimes of Eurasia when a note is passed into his hand; he does not stop speaking for a moment, or change his voice or manner, but (according to the changed party line) he now condemns the crimes of Eastasia, which is Oceania's new enemy.
