I'm waiting to hear which argument he is going to take.
It is either:
1) all mud samples are contaminated so they should be published regardless, (even if grossly unrepresentative) or
2) the samples were not contaminated because the ASX publications don't give granular detail on how they were contaminated.
Both positions are irrational.
MOVE your SUPER-TANKER out of my DEEP-WATER PORT, page-164
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 903 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
