I'm waiting to hear which argument he is going to take.
It is either:
1) all mud samples are contaminated so they should be published regardless, (even if grossly unrepresentative) or
2) the samples were not contaminated because the ASX publications don't give granular detail on how they were contaminated.
Both positions are irrational.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- MOVE your SUPER-TANKER out of my DEEP-WATER PORT
I'm waiting to hear which argument he is going to take. It is...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 903 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add MAY (ASX) to my watchlist
(20min delay)
|
|||||
Last
3.1¢ |
Change
0.001(3.33%) |
Mkt cap ! $104.4M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
3.0¢ | 3.2¢ | 3.0¢ | $77.72K | 2.484M |
Buyers (Bids)
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
3 | 308306 | 3.1¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
3.2¢ | 74464 | 1 |
View Market Depth
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
3 | 308306 | 0.031 |
15 | 2834686 | 0.030 |
13 | 1879377 | 0.029 |
6 | 3448572 | 0.028 |
5 | 1131370 | 0.027 |
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
0.032 | 74464 | 1 |
0.033 | 1170000 | 3 |
0.034 | 151693 | 2 |
0.035 | 271623 | 2 |
0.036 | 150000 | 1 |
Last trade - 16.10pm 11/10/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
Featured News
MAY (ASX) Chart |