My recollection is @Vince120 had to prove you were wrong, as you contested you were correct right up until it was proved you were wrong and moreover at no point did you concede any error or give hints, and were still throwing punches when you hit the canvas... Do you now contest that?
You hint at an oil background , but maybe a failed one?... @Vince120 ran complete rings around you, forgetting to convert metres to feet, talk about basic, had to be spoon fed
Make me a liar!"
... not only are you wrong, you're also doing the usual 're-writing of history' S78 style in an attempt to discredit people ... fail ..
...
Vince thought it was to do with Newton !! ... LOL and you Cone thought it was
SG ... lol ... absolutely no idea ...
even with me spoon-feeding you the numbers ! as below
proves in black and white ... lol ...
... note the post below were I post ... '
the numbers are here 'again' for you - 0.052." ... giving you the numbers ! [HINTS]
Linebacker11
4,495 Posts.
30/01/24 22:01
Post #: 72144531
... Boom ... yeah my bad, good pick-up ... 25 yrs doing these off the top of my head ... maybe I should spend more time on posts ... naa ... anyway we're not on a well so who cares ...... though to be fair you didn't understand the formula at the start Vince [0.052], as above you went for the PSI/KPA ans. ... but with maybe a good google you had the smarts to pick-up my miss"
Vince120
432 Posts.
31/01/24 05:50
Post #: 72146267
Sorry Pal you're wrong on the 0.052 as well.
Remember that guy called Newton?
You know f=mathe formulas use that principle.
lol you really should stop. lol"
Linebacker11
4,495 Posts.
31/01/24 17:28
Post #: 72167135
... try again Vince-Newton, how to get to psi from ppg ? ... spoon-feeding 'again' ... you'll get it soon.
... it took you two attempts last time on the first answer ... the numbers are here 'again' for you - 0.052.
... nothing changes what I missed, but that doesn't mean you understood what you were really doing ...
... you're just a S78 & Flam-Mark11 ... slightly better at an internet search ... but you should have stopped while ahead."
... and here you prove along with Vince already that you also had absolutely no idea of what was going on ...
thecone
7,212 Posts.
30/01/24 08:59
Post #: 72125179
He's changed the mudweight from 1.8 to 1 to come up with 2843 Psi...? The mudweight is unknown ...but 1? FFS!
Also think he's trying to use surface (hp) pressure to make a smaller number appear as though that would be the reservoir pressure"
Linebacker11
4,495 Posts.
30/01/24 22:07
Post #: 72144588
.
.. what ?!! ... Vince120 just aced me and you still don't get it, even when it's posted in your face ... lol
... SG-1.000 = 8.33 ppg ... so how do you and others not understand that ~12ppg is not SG-1.000 ... lol ...
... Linebacker11 posted - ... "first you may need to convert SG to PPG ... SG-1.5 x 8.33 = ~12.5 ppg" ...
... unreal ... lol ...
... even as basic as this all is, doubt you have any concept of what is going on, as these posts prove.
(20min delay)