Out of interest, has anyone seen, or know of, in detail, these emails that are the centre of all this?
Speaking ONLY FACTS for the moment, what do we KNOW?
... An understandable question I have is why would a company go to the trouble of doing what MZN is doing, unless they thought they had some sort of case? Surely if they had no chance, they would be very unwise to risk a bad judgement? As a KDR holder, this aspect concerns me I must say.
However, on the other side, it appears that in the past, neither company has announced to its shareholders, the "sale" or "purchase" or intention to do same, of the said lithium tenement and lithium rights to the other party ... Am I correct in this belief? Can anyone positively confirm this?
No matter how trivial the sale or purchase of an asset might be, it's advice and details thereof to shareholders, would be a statutory requirement, is it not?
.... If neither company has advised its shareholders of this sale agreement, or details of an intention, then surely, by dint of such a fact/"non-action", it is a very long bow to draw, to say there is any agreement in place???
Keeping a response "unemotional" and as well as possible: "factual", can anyone shed any light on the points I'm raising here? Many thanks in advance...
Kip
Expand
