mRNA another damning study

  1. 8,558 Posts.
    lightbulb Created with Sketch. 502
    in Nature, no less. What is says is that 1/4 of cells transfected with mRNA produce random proteins not the intended spike protein. So everyone who got injected had potentially billions and billions transfected cells and 1/4 of them are were producing random proteins, for a random, unknown amount of time. What could possibly go wrong? Doesn't sound like Russian roulette at all.

    Even one of the study authors says along the lines "if this problem could be fixed, it would massively de-risk the mRNA technology platform" suggesting the mRNA vaccine platform as is carries massive risks.

    And while the press have gone all out to say there's no proof of adverse effects, use your brain. And.... bollocks... there's just not evidence the establishment will allow to be funded, investigated or publicly reproduced in a mass audience setting. Better to arrest whistle-blowers and sack-censor-and-sue doctors or scientists who do produce critical science.

    Perhaps some of the posters who are so sure of their safe and effective science might like to update themselves

    Oh... and how's that Monash/Moderna build out coming along? Think of all the freak proteins your cells can produce in the future, mmmm cool. I am sure its all fine. They are THE experts.


    https://hotcopper.com.au/data/attachments/5805/5805406-ffabce7358b36b778ff68efcb034a40e.jpg

    https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-023-06800-3

    https://www.aussie17.com/p/explosive-study-published-in-nature

    https://meaninginhistory.substack.com/p/important-new-study-on-mechanism

    https://joomi.substack.com/p/new-evidence-that-modified-mrna-can
    Last edited by sahmee: 09/12/23
 
arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.