MSB to dispute FDA finding in Type A meeting, page-117

It's called gambling Jake. It's what we're all doing.

some of us are more happy to admit it than others.

I never liked the odds in the first instance. I kept banging on about the concerns raised in the FDA meeting. But nobody cared to give them much credence.

Turns out I was right. Everyone kept saying "oh if there's a problem it'll be with manufacturing". But judging by the 'additional study' request - the FDA concern has nothing to do with manufacturing. And more likely everything to do with all the points i raised. eg. SI's inability to describe MOA in vivo etc etc.

All the evidence was there. people's rose coloured glasses got in the way. But everyone called me a downramper.

I'm a realist my friend. I invest a little if i fear i'm wrong. I'd have invested a lot more if I believed i was wrong.