My observation is more focused on a poster that unequivocally...

My observation is more focused on a poster that unequivocally states an opinion (e.g Teva are "bone-heads") and then pretends that they had never (equally unequivocally and only a few days prior) defended a completely opposite opinion (Teva are a "fantastic" partner).

I said a group of bone-headed number crunchers had taken control of Teva.

That is, the numbers men. This is VERY different to damning the entire company from the beginning, isn't it?

Teva, to the extent that it contained past employees of Cephalon, and were backing the Cephalon decisions were a very good partner. When they diverged from this, they became much less smart.

Surely you can stop misquoting me?

And acknowledge where I got it right, particularly about FDA revising the protocols to allow for the particular characteristics (and much lower risk profile) of stem cell technology. I guess not.