MSC minerals corporation limited

I e-mailed MSC with a few queries regarding their operations. I...

  1. 214 Posts.
    I e-mailed MSC with a few queries regarding their operations. I will post the e-mail I sent them later tonight, but below is the e-mail response.

    Seems 2004 could be a great year for MSC. I guess time will tell.

    The recent buying has been good, but appears to be the Fat Prohphet crew.


    ----------------


    Dear xxxx,


    Per your email,

    1) Delays are the most frustrating aspects of new projects
    particularly in mining where regulatory delays cover much of our
    operations,usually all different govt depts. The barge compliance papers
    are awaited and we hope we shall get these early after Xmas. We do not have
    Kaolin quality issues. These are formulation issues matching product specs
    to customer requirements which in the case of our ceramics products required
    a modified plant process. We hired a qualified ceramist in March 2003 to
    replace our earlier consultant and customer feedback has been very positive
    and we have moved on to more advanced tests with UK customers with a
    product launch expected early 2004. We have also made good progress with
    our paper and rubber products testing with customers in Asia. Paint,(our
    first product release), has met customer specs and we are supplying a major
    Australian coy and once our barge is OK we will bulk ship these products to
    Europe, planned for Feb/Mar. following bulk production in January'Feb.

    2) We have numerous signed customer contracts , some awaiting
    delivery, some awaiting customer changeover scheduling which depends on
    their production planners, etc. Japan is not moving as fast as I wish and
    we may make some changes.

    3) Correct, in the middle of the offer a number of analysts advised
    the ords were much better value than the prefs,(eg Fat Prophets),which is
    flattering in some respects but no doubt reduced investor appetite, likewise
    the market appetite for equities vs. fixed interest turned strongly against
    the Deb issue and the take up was disappointing, however the structure is in
    place for the future.

    4) 2003 has been quite a difficult year but we are in much better
    shape for 2004 and announcements will be made when meaningful.

    5) The Cornell facility is new to Australia and is not understood. It
    effectively provides the company with an equity funding guarantee over 3
    years which we can use at our option. Considering that the biggest risk
    for new projects is finance it very significantly reduces risk and in my
    personal view warrants an extra 10 cents to our share price, we will need to
    promote these points with brokers in the New Year. Dilution is minimized
    assuming we build the share price over the next 3 years as we only pay 3%
    discount to prevail

    ing mkt price vs. 20% for institutional placements



    Rgds



    Vic Alexander

 
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?
A personalised tool to help users track selected stocks. Delivering real-time notifications on price updates, announcements, and performance stats on each to help make informed investment decisions.

Currently unlisted public company.

arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.